Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance Companies

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 27, 1989No. 876PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MONTGOMERY, Judge:

The Plaintiff-Appellee, Arzenia Delarosa Johnson, was allegedly injured when the taxicab in which she was a passenger was struck by a hit and run driver. She instituted this action to obtain damages through the taxicab owner’s uninsured motorist insurance policy. The Defendant-*94Appellant, Pennsylvania National Insurance Companies, filed preliminary objections, asserting that the insurance policy required that the Plaintiffs claim be submitted to arbitration. The judge who considered this matter denied the preliminary objections, based upon an earlier decision in a similar…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Utica Mutual Insurance v. ContriscianeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Lincoln University of the Commonwealth System of Higher Education v. Lincoln University Chapter of the American Ass'n of University ProfessorsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Yudacufski v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Cumberland-Perry Area Vocational-Technical School Authority v. Bogar & BinkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Miller v. the Travelers Ins. Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Pennsylvania National Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Lombardo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992
  3. McFarley v. American Independent InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Muse v. CermakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. Prudential Property & Casualty InsuranceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API