Legal Opinion
Randall v. Bank One National Ass'n (In Re Randall)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 1, 2006No. 19-10753PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BRUCE FOX, Bankruptcy Judge.
The chapter 13 debtor, Cheryl A. Randall, has commenced an adversary proceeding against defendants Bank One, N.A. and Bankers First Mortgage Co. 1 Defendant Bank One has filed a motion to dismiss this proceeding pursuant to Fed. R. Bankr.P. 7012, incorporating Fed. R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and (b)(6).
As will be discussed below, Bank One contends that the claims against it are barred by the Rooker-Feldmcm doctrine, res judicata, collateral estoppel and the statute of limitations. The plaintiff contends that none of her claims warrant dismissal.
For the following…
2Cases cited105 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Viener v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Association Resources, Inc. v. WallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Holber v. Jacobs (In Re Jacobs)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- Stewart v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (In re Stewart)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2012
- Madera v. Ameriquest Mortgage Co. (In Re Madera)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.