Legal Opinion
Wright v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided January 23, 2015No. Case No. 1:13-cv-716PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
JANET T. NEFF, District Judge.
Pending before the Court in this diversity-products liability action is Defendants’ *604Motion to Dismiss (Dkt 113). Plaintiff filed a response in opposition to Defendants’ motion (Dkt 115), and Defendants filed a reply (Dkt 116). Defendants have also since filed numerous supplemental authorities for the Court’s consideration (Dkts 128-26, 131-33). Having conducted a Pre-Motion Conference in this matter and having fully considered the parties’ written briefs and accompanying exhibits, the Court finds that the relevant facts and arguments are adequately…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Buckman Co. v. Plaintiffs' Legal CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Riegel v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Total Benefits Planning Agency, Inc. v. Anthem Blue Cross & Blue ShieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aetna Inc. v. Insys Therapeutics, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2018
- Arthur v. Medtronic, Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2015
- Mendez v. ShahDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
- Perdue v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Jones v. MedtronicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.