Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Medtronic, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided August 24, 2015No. 4:14-CV-52 (CEJ)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CAROL E. JACKSON, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss plaintiffs first *1148amended complaint pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 9(b) and 12(b)(6). Plaintiff has filed a response in opposition and the issues are fully briefed.
I. Background
On December 1, 2008, plaintiff Kathleen Arthur underwent an anterior cervical dis-cectomy and fusion surgery (ACDF) in which her surgeon implanted the Infuse Bone Graft/LT-Cage Lumbar Tapered Fusion Device (“Infuse”), manufactured by defendants Medtronic, Inc., and Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Freed v. St. Jude Med., Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- OS33 v. Centurylink Commc'ns, L.L.C.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 2018
- Beery v. RoperDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
- FCS Advisors, LLC v. State of MissouriDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2017
- Lefebvre v. Washington University in St. LouisDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.