Legal Opinion

Holston Salt & Plaster Co. v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided November 17, 1892PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Argued at Wytheville. Decided at Richmond. Error to judgment of circuit court of Smyth county, at March term, 1891, in an action of ejectment wherein James C. Campbell, trustee for Thomas L. Preston, et al., were plaintiffs, and the Holston Salt and Plaster Company was defendant. The judgment being adverse to defendant, it obtained a writ of error to this court. Opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, P.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action of ejectment to recover a tract of two hundred and twenty acres of land situate in Smyth county. The land, in controversy, together with the Preston Salt Works and various other tracts of land, situate in Smyth and other counties, and indeed his whole estate, real and personal, was conveyed, on the 7th of July, 1859, by Thomas L. Preston to-Robert. Gibboney, in trust for the payment of debts. In the deed of trust the salt works property is described as “ that tract or parcel of land, lying in Smyth county, on the waters of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Railroad Co. v. TrimbleSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Goddard v. FosterSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  3. Knick v. KnickSupreme Court of Virginia · 1880
  4. Findley's ex'ors v. FindleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1854
  5. Nash v. DriscoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1864

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Southern Pacific R.R. Co.California Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wild v. People ex rel. StephensIllinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. CGI Federal Inc. v. FCi Federal, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  4. Ralya v. E. C. Atkins & Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Peoples Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. LandstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1920

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API