Legal Opinion

Nash v. Drisco

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions from tho ruling at Nisi Prius of Davis, J. This was an action of trespass.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of tho Court was drawn up by

Davis, J.

The plaintiffs purchased of the defendant, by a written contract or permit, " the right to cut and haul all the timber and bark” on certain premises, " down to as small as ten inches at the stump or but of the trees.” Under this the plaintiffs operated, cutting and. taking away timber for vessels, and for other purposes. And they also cut trees for firewood, and had it corded up, ready to be hauled away. While the wood was in this condition, the defendant, claiming that the plaintiffs had no right to cut it, took it himself, and appropriated it…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Zamore v. WhittenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. Holston Salt & Plaster Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  3. Balderson v. SeeleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Century Homes, Inc. v. PlaistedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  5. Casselberry v. Stair, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lycoming County1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API