Legal Opinion

Findley's ex'ors v. Findley

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided August 14, 1854PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The case is sufficiently stated in the opinion of Judge Samuels.

1Opinion of the CourtSamuels, J.

On the 12th of November 1841 Samuel Findley and Elizabeth S. Haraest entered into an agreement of that date, in writing and under seal, reciting in effect that a marriage was shortly intended to be had and solemnized, by the permission of Grod, between the parties; declaring, amongst other things, *435that it was distinctly understood and agreed, that in the event of said Samuel Findley departing this life first, or before the said Elizabeth, that said Findley bound his heirs, executors, &c. to pay to the said Elizabeth the sum of ten hundred dollars : say about one-half in cash, and the other…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McReynolds v. CountsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1852
  2. Bowyer v. Martin & CarrawaySupreme Court of Virginia · 1828

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Nye v. LovittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1896
  2. Langley v. OwensSupreme Court of Florida · 1906
  3. Holston Salt & Plaster Co. v. CampbellSupreme Court of Virginia · 1892
  4. Nelson's Adm'r v. Kownslar's Ex'orSupreme Court of Virginia · 1884
  5. City of Roanoke v. BlairSupreme Court of Virginia · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API