Inland Foundry Co. v. Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
We are asked to again visit this ongoing dispute between Inland Foundry Company, Inc. (Inland) and the Spokane County Air Pollution Control Authority (SCAPCA). The dispositive question here is whether Inland can challenge a SCAPCA regulatory classification before the Pollution Control Hearings Board (PCHB). We conclude it cannot and therefore affirm the trial court’s decision affirming the PCHB.
FACTS
The underlying litigation started after SCAPCA imposed a $182 registration fee on Inland. Inland refused to pay and appealed to PCHB. Inland contended that SCAPCA was required by its enabling…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Crosby v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- Okanogan Wilderness League, Inc. v. Town of TwispWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Dioxin/Organochlorine Center v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Pollution Control Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
- City of Seattle v. Department of EcologyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. State, Dept. of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Harting v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Shoop v. Kittitas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.