Legal Opinion

Harting v. Barton

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 17, 2000No. 17699-1-IIIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

6 P.3d 91 (2000)

101 Wash.App. 954

Wallace HARTING and Linda Harting, Husband and Wife, Respondents,

v.

George BARTON, Appellant,

Nevada Land and Livestock, a corporation, Defendant.

No. 17699-1-III.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 3, Panel Three.

August 17, 2000.

Mary E. Schultz, Spokane, for Appellant.

Richard F. Monahan, Roach, Monahan & Lowry, Walla Walla, for Respondents.

SWEENEY, J.

This is a dispute over a farm lease and option to purchase agreement. The lease and option agreement required the lessee/optionee to farm the property in a "professional farm-like manner." The dispositive…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Berg v. HudesmanWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Henderson v. TyrrellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
  5. Walker v. BangsWashington Supreme Court · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Otis Housing Ass'n v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Otis Housing Ass'n, Inc. v. HaWashington Supreme Court · 2009
  3. River House Development, Inc. v. Integrus ArchitectureCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Heath v. UragaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Palmer v. GoldenCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API