Legal Opinion
VANHORN v. Florida
District Court, M.D. Florida
Decided March 9, 2009No. 6:09-cv-00258PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.
On August 21, 2008, Kent Allen Van-Horn (“VanHorn”) filed a “Motion to Return Property and Money per Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure per (Rule 41(g))” (the “motion to return property” [Doc. 1]) seeking (a) an evidentiary hearing to determine whether money and documents allegedly seized by the Drug Enforcement Administration (the “DEA”) in the course of a search of VanHorn’s residence should be returned to VanHorn, (b) an order directing the DEA to show cause why the seized property should not be returned and to “produce all records, and receipts,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- HBI, L.L.C. v. BarnetteNebraska Supreme Court · 2020
- VanHorn v. D.E.A.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2009
- Vanhorn v. DeaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009