Legal Opinion

VanHorn v. D.E.A.

District Court, M.D. Florida

Decided May 29, 2009No. Case No. 8:09-cv-258-T-23EAJPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

STEVEN D. MERRYDAY, District Judge.

Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 983(e), the pro se plaintiff, Kent Allen VanHorn, moves (Doc. 9) to set aside a March 31, 2005, declaration of forfeiture to the United States of $19,460.00 in U.S. currency seized from VanHorn’s home by agents of the Drug Enforcement Administration. The United States responds (Docs. 12 & 13) in opposition, and both parties submitted evidence and examined witnesses at a May 19, 2009, evidentiary hearing.

BACKGROUND

Acting on information obtained from a cooperating defendant and confirmed by independent investigation, on November…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  3. Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Dusenbery v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Tulsa Professional Collection Services, Inc. v. PopeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nichols v. Kansas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Vanhorn v. DeaDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API