Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Andrews v. Chateau X, Inc.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 4, 1979No. 23PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

COPELAND, Justice.

This case concerns the statutory construction and constitutionality of Chapter 19 of North Carolina General Statutes. For the reasons set out below, we have determined that Chapter 19 as interpreted and applied in this case is constitutional; therefore, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Both parties in this action have brought up assignments of error to this Court. The State is challenging certain interpretations and applications of Chapter 19 by the court below. As the resolution of these issues affects the defendants’ constitutional questions, we will consider…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Dombrowski v. PfisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Near v. Minnesota Ex Rel. OlsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Young v. American Mini Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. PetersilieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  2. Flippin v. JarrellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. J-R Distributors, Inc. v. EikenberryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. State ex rel. Kidwell v. U. S. Marketing, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Cavanagh v. BrockDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1983

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API