Legal Opinion
City of Durham v. Manson
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided October 10, 1974No. 25PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOORE, Justice.
Defendants contend first that the Court of Appeals erred in passing upon the constitutionality of Chapter 506, which incorporates Article 9 of Chapter 136 of the General Statutes, the so-called “quick-take” procedure for condemnation under which plaintiff filed this action.
The trial court dismissed the action for the reason that G.S. 160-205, as amended by Chapter 506, had been repealed by Chapter 698, Session Laws of 1971 (now codified as Chapter 160A of the General Statutes). In the judgment dismissing the action, the trial court stated: “The court reserves the question of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Irvine v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Edelman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Rate BureauSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
- State v. WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. CreasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. McDowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.