Hardin v. Klickitat County
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Klickitat county, Darcli, J., entered May 14,1920, upon an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint and dismissing an action to restrain county commissioners from proceeding with a highway improvement.
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
This action was brought by a taxpayer of Klickitat county, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated, to restrain the county commissioners of that county from proceeding with the improvement of a public highway under Eem. Code, §§ 5730-5782, commonly known as the Donohue Eoad Law, and the amendment thereto found in Laws of 1917, p. 238, ch. 72. The county commissioners had granted the petition for the improvement and by resolution had authorized the organization of an improvement district. Under the direction of the commissioners the road to be improved was surveyed and an estimate…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Quill v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
- Uhler v. City of OlympiaWashington Supreme Court · 1915
- Board of Commissioner v. HarrellIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- German-American Savings Bank v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Twichell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1919
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Comfort v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- State Ex Rel. Wenatchee Etc. Dist. v. BankerWashington Supreme Court · 1934