Legal Opinion

Board of Commissioner v. Harrell

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1897No. 18,045PublishedCited by 47 opinions

From the Monroe Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

This appeal was taken from an interlocutory order restraining appellant from letting a contract to construct a free gravel road in Clear Creek *500township, Monroe county, under the provisions of the act of 1893 (Acts 1893, p. 196), sections 6924-6934, Burns’ R. S. 1894, as amended by the act of 1895 (Acts 1895, p. 143).

The injunction was asked upon two grounds:

First, That appellant had no right or authority in law to call an election to vote on the two roads in question for the reason that there was a single petition filed before the board to build three free gravel roads iu Clear Creek…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Perkins v. HaywardIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Stoddard v. JohnsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  4. Gilson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. SuttonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Board of Commissioners v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Loomis v. RogersMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Martin v. Ben Davis Conservancy DistrictIndiana Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Board of Commissioners v. ConnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Lehi City v. Meiling, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1935

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API