Katt v. Village of Sturtevant
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBroadfoot, J.
The defendants contend that summary judgment should not have been granted because the pleadings and affidavits in the record raise substantial issues of fact to be tried. The complaint did allege that prior to and on the 17th day of November, 1953, plaintiff owned and maintained on his property a total of 22 mink. This was denied in the answer. If the plaintiff were claiming to be exempt from the operation of the ordinance under the provisions of section 5 thereof on the ground that his business was established before the adoption of either ordinance, issues of fact would be presented and a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- State ex rel. Reynolds v. SandeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- City of Juneau v. Badger Co-operative Oil Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. State Board of HealthWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by4 opinions
- City News & Novelty, Inc. v. City of WaukeshaCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1999
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- City of Waukesha v. TOWN BOARD OF WAUKESHACourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
- Russell Dairy Stores, Inc. v. City of Chippewa FallsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956