Legal Opinion
Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Decided October 4, 1966PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
We are satisfied the action is ripe for determination under the Declaratory Judgments Act, sec. 269.56, Stats. The town government is required to follow the statute under which the legislature has granted it power to zone. Sec. 62.23 (7), under which the town of Bellevue enacted its zoning ordinance, provides at sub. (b) as follows:
“ (b) Districts. For any and all of said purposes the council may divide the city into districts of such number, shape, and area as may be deemed best suited to carry out the purposes of this section; and within such districts it may regulate and restrict the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Ford Hopkins Co. v. Mayor of WatertownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Boerschinger v. Elkay Enterprises, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- Ball v. Town Plan & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Katt v. Village of SturtevantWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. B'nai B'rith Foundation of the United States v. Walworth County Board of AdjustmentWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
- Anderson House, LLC v. Mayor of RockvilleCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- State Ex Rel. Zupancic v. SchimenzWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
- Lake Country Racquet & Athletic Club, Inc. v. Village of HartlandCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Jachimek v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.