State ex rel. Reynolds v. Sande
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The sole question to be determined is the constitutionality of ch. 392 of the Laws of 1931. The particular proceeding asks for the relief provided for in sec. 5 of the act, governing the selection of a judge pending the regular election, and this section places upon the common councils of the cities-of Neenah and Menasha the responsibility for this election. The legislature has no authority to provide for the selection of a judge in this manner. The concrete proposition which presents itself here was considered in In re Burke, 76 Wis. 357, 45 N. W. 24, where the matter of the appointment of a…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Attorney General v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Zitske v. GoldbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1875
- Atkins v. FrakerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1873
- In re BurkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Rogers-Ruger Co. v. MurrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State ex rel. Wisconsin Telephone Co. v. HenryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
- City of Beloit v. Town of BeloitWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968
- State v. HallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Madison v. NickelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
- Heimerl v. Ozaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1949
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.