Legal Opinion

Hamilton v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 8, 1915No. 19,230PublishedCited by 42 opinions

Appeal from Montgomery district court; THOMAS J. Flannelly, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*355The opinion of the court was delivered by

Marshall, J.:

The plaintiff was the owner of certain pasturé lands, a portion of which was condemned for the use of the defendant company for the construction of a reservoir for storing water. The condemnation commissioners awarded the plaintiff $5500. He appealed to the district court, where he recovered judgment for $5513.40. He appeals again, and contends that he should be granted a new .trial, for reasons which we discuss.(1) The plaintiff complains that the assessor was permitted to testify that he assessed the lands in controversy at certain…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. State v. PfefferleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1886
  2. State v. McCormickSupreme Court of Kansas · 1896
  3. O'Neal v. BainbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Stone v. FrenchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
  5. City of Ottawa v. GillilandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1901

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Gailey v. Peet Bros. Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  3. Emery v. BennettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1916
  4. Board of Com'rs of Dona Ana County v. GardnerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  5. E. L. Farmer & Company, a Corporation v. Marshall W. Hooks and American Motorists Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API