State v. Kurtz
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.
In this criminal case, defendant appeals, assigning error to the trial court’s imposition of court-appointed attorney fees. The state concedes that the trial court erred in imposing the fees; we agree, and, therefore, we reverse the portion of the trial court’s judgment that imposes the fees and otherwise affirm.1
Defendant was charged with, and convicted of, felony assault in the fourth degree, ORS 163.160 (Count 1); menacing, ORS 163.190 (Count 2); coercion, ORS 163.275 (Count 3); and tampering with a witness, ORS 162.285 (Counts 4-10). The trial court ordered defendant to serve 120 months…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ailes v. Portland Meadows, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Eads v. BormanOregon Supreme Court · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. West-HowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016