State v. West-Howell
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtGarrett, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment convicting him of, among other offenses, two counts of first-degree sodomy, ORS 163.4051 (Counts 2 and 5). He assigns error to the trial court’s failure to merge the guilty verdicts on those two counts into a single conviction under ORS 161.0672 (the antimerger statute), arguing that the record lacks evidence of a sufficient pause between the two violations. Defendant also raises an unpreserved challenge to the trial court’s imposition of court-appointed attorney fees. For the reasons explained below, we reverse the portion of the judgment that requires defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- State v. CoverstoneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- State v. WhiteOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. PendergraphtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- State v. HuffmanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. BarnumOregon Supreme Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. NelsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. BartonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. DuganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- State v. LasheskiCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- State v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.