Legal Opinion
Boushel v. Toro Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided February 3, 1993No. 92-1275PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGILL, Circuit Judge.
This appeal arises from a decision by the district court1 to stay proceedings pending resolution of a concurrent Canadian action concerning the same operative facts. Because we find the district court’s order to be a non-final order not subject to appeal, we dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
I
Thomas M. Boushel and his wife, Lyna Marie Gelinas-Boushel, are both Canadian citizens and residents of Quebec. Thomas M. Boushel Holdings, Ltd., and Turfquip, Inc., are Quebec corporations owned and controlled by the Boushels. These appellants collectively will be…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- John Cottrell v. Michael DukeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Michelson v. Citicorp National Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Susan Wolfson v. Mutual Benefit Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- KREDITVEREIN DER BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT FUR NIEDERÖSTERREICH UND BERGENLAND BANK AUSTRIA CREDITANSTALT AG v. CHRISTA NEJEZCHLEBACourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2007
- EFCO Corp. v. Aluma Systems, USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 1997
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.