EFCO Corp. v. Aluma Systems, USA, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS OR TO STAY
PRATT, District Judge.
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Canadian defendants moved to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction in Iowa. In the alternative, defendants requested this court to stay proceedings in light of related proceedings in Canada. The court denies the motion to dismiss and grants defendants’ requested stay.
I. Background:
Plaintiff, EFCO Corp., 1 is an Iowa corporation with its principal place of business in Iowa. Plaintiff, Economy Forms Ltd., is a limited company incorporated in Iowa and registered to do business in…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- CoStar Group, Inc. v. LoopNet, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Drayton Enterprises, L.L.C. v. DunkerDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 2001
- Larson Manufacturing Co. of South Dakota, Inc. v. Connecticut Greenstar, Inc.District Court, D. South Dakota · 2013
- Relco Locomotives, Inc. v. Allrail, Inc.District Court, S.D. Iowa · 2014
- Goldhammer v. Dunkin' Donuts, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1999
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.