Legal Opinion
Grober v. Mako Products, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided July 30, 2012No. 2010-1519, 2010-1527PublishedCited by 104 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RADER, Chief Judge.
The United States District Court for the Central District of California granted summary judgment of noninfringement to the defendants (Mako Products, Inc.; Air Sea Land Productions, Inc.; CineVideoTech, Inc.; Spectrum Effects, Inc.; Blue Sky Aerials, Inc.; Jordan Klein’s, Sr.; Jordan Klein’s, Jr.; and Oppenheimer Cine Rental, LLC) on the patent owned by David Grober and Voice International, Inc. (“Appellants”). Several defendants cross-appeal the district court’s denial of attorney’s fees. For the reasons recited below, this court affirms-in-part, vacates-in-part, and…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by104 opinions
- 3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Celgard, LLC v. Sk Innovation Co., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Georgetown Rail Equipment Co. v. Holland L.P.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Acorda Therapeutics Inc. v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Nexlearn, LLC v. Allen Interactions, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
99 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.