Legal Opinion
3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 6, 2013No. 2012-1241PublishedCited by 153 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
This appeal deals with claim construction disputes arising out of 3M Innovative Properties Company and 3M Company’s (collectively, “3M”) allegations of patent infringement brought against Tredegar Corporation and Tredegar Film Products Corporation (collectively, “Tredegar”) in the United States District Court for the District of Minnesota (“district court”). 3M competes in the elastomeric laminate industry with Tredegar. 3M is a global manufacturing company that sells laminate products such as diapers. Tredegar is a supplier of breathable and nonwoven film laminates for…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Renishaw Plc v. Marposs Societa' Per Azioni and Marposs CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Thorner v. Sony Computer Entertainment America LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by153 opinions
- Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology v. Shire Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Huawei Techs., Co. v. Samsung Elecs. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
- Iridescent Networks, Inc. v. At&t Mobility, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- Baxalta Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
148 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.