Legal Opinion

Railway Co. v. Higdon

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1903PublishedCited by 10 opinions

PROM POLK. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Pollc County. — N. Q. Allen, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Beard

The defendant in error was the owner of three hundred and twenty acres of land lying in Polk county, of this State, on both sides of the Hiwassee river, extend-’ ing from the foot of the mountain on the north side of this river to the elevated ground on the south side. His residence stood near the northwest corner of the tract, and a few hundred feet from the north bank of the river. Adjoining him on the west was the tract of one Seymour, and on this was located a spring, the natural flow of which was to the west, until, passing around the *123point of elevated land which extended along the river…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chattanooga v. DowlingTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Harmon v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Carriger v. East Tenn., Va. & Ga.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hord v. Holston River RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co. v. RoddyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad Co. v. QuillenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. Knott v. Louisville & N. R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  5. White v. N. C. & St. L. Ry.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API