Legal Opinion

Weidenfeld v. Pacific Improvement Co.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 14, 1939No. 202PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.

This action was brought by Weidenfeld on October 25, 1922, to recover possession of a note of The Central New York & Western Railroad Co. payable to him in the sum of $74,746.87 and 208 bonds alleged to have been security for the note, or the sum of $500,000 in case possession of the said note and bonds could not be given to the plaintiff. The plaintiff had brought a prior action to recover possession of the same note and collateral and to obtain a judgment for $459,466.67 in case possession of the note and bonds should not be given to the plaintiff. The prior…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
  2. Wilner v. Independent Order Ahawas IsraelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  3. Pacific Improvement Co. v. WeidenfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
  4. Hempsted v. White Sewing Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  5. McDevitt v. HyattAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  2. Roland Hacopian v. United States Department of Labor, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  4. World Athletic Sports Corp. v. PahlaviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
  5. Gaussen v. United Fruit Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API