Gaussen v. United Fruit Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
McLEAN, District Judge.
This is a seaman’s action. Plaintiff obtained a jury verdict in his favor. Judge Tyler refused to set it aside, but he stated that defendant’s evidence was “overwhelmingly convincing.” In May 1969 the Court of Appeals reversed the judgment because of certain rulings on the admission of evidence and ordered a new trial. Gaussen v. United Fruit Company, 412 F.2d 72 (2d Cir.1969). It awarded costs of the appeal to defendant. Although the record is somewhat confused as to the amount of these costs, which apparently were erroneously computed in the first instance, I gather…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Clarence D. Gaussen v. United Fruit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Gregory v. DimockCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
- Weidenfeld v. Pacific Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- World Athletic Sports Corp. v. PahlaviDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1966
- Commercial Banking Corp. v. MartelDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hartford Textile Corporation v. Hartford Textile CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Hugney v. Consolidation Coal Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Falcon v. General Telephone Co. of SouthwestDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
- Sanderson v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1981
- Prudential Oil Corp. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.