Legal Opinion
Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 4, 1965No. 19739PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MERRILL, Circuit Judge.
Appeal is taken from judgment dismissing this private antitrust action for failure of appellant to prosecute, pursuant to remands for new trial from this court, 316 F.2d 275, and from the Supreme Court, 370 U.S. 19, 82 S.Ct. 1130, 8 L.Ed.2d 305.
It is conceded that prosecution could not be had due to an order of the District Court staying further proceedings until appellant had made or secured judgment for costs incurred in the earlier proceedings before this court and the Supreme Court. Appellant is bankrupt and its only asset is this cause of action. It was…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Sunkist Growers, Inc. v. Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Glidden Company v. Zdanok Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- E. v. Prentice MacHinery Co. And Prentice MacHinery Works, Inc. v. Associated Plywood Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship ClerksDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Weidenfeld v. Pacific Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 92,714 Edwin J. Herpich v. Robert H. Wallace, Jack E. LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Pope v. Intermountain Gas Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1982
- Hobart Brothers Company v. Malcolm T. Gilliland, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Occidental Petroleum Corp. v. Buttes Gas & Oil Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1971
- Medallion TV Enterprises, Inc. v. SelecTV of California, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 1986
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.