Legal Opinion
Gainey v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 30, 1963No. Civ. A. No. 32898PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FREEDMAN, District Judge.
The defendants have moved for a stay of further proceedings until plaintiffs pay the costs in two previous ' actions. The defendant Brotherhood in addition seeks security for costs in the present action and a stay until such security is given.
The total costs taxed in the'first two actions against the plaintiffs and in favor of the defendant Brotherhood is $889.65 and in favor of the Railroad is. $862.20. Each defendant collected $125 on an appeal bond filed in the second case, so that net costs outstanding in favor of the Brotherhood is $764.65 and in favor of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Steele v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- McClure v. Borne Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1961
- Henderson v. GriffinSupreme Court of the United States · 1831
- Durnin v. Allentown Federal Savings and Loan Ass'n.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Murphy v. TaylorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- John Hawes, Etc. v. Club Ecuestre El Comandante, Nancy Kreitzer v. Puerto Rican Cars, Inc., Daniel Ventura v. El Conquistador HotelCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- Phoenix Canada Oil Co. v. Texaco, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1978
- Clemens v. Central Railroad Company of New JerseyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1967
- Winckler & Smith Citrus Products Co. v. Sunkist Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
- Roland Hacopian v. United States Department of Labor, United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.