Legal Opinion

Melendez v. Beal

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 27, 1984No. 01-84-00379-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DOYLE, Justice.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment against appellant in a medical malpractice case. Appellees based their motion for summary judgment on the medical malpractice limitation defense in Tex.Rev. Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4590i, sec. 10.01 (Vernon Supp.1984).

Appellant Melendez entered St. Elizabeth Hospital in May 1968 for appellee Dr. Beal to surgically remove her gall bladder. Ap-pellees Paula Penn and Rose Mary Simmons were nurses who assisted in the surgery.

Appellant had no further problems until May 1981, when she began to experience a pulling sensation and pain in her…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Lebohm v. City of GalvestonTexas Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. DeRuy v. Garza, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
  2. Leeds v. Cooley, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
  3. Riley v. FitzgeraldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Flores v. Law, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1999
  5. Waggoner v. GibsonDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1986

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API