Legal Opinion

Flores v. Law

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided December 23, 1999No. 01-99-00279-CVPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER, Chief Justice.

This is a dispute regarding the constitutionality of section 101.106 1 of the Texas Tort Claims Act. 2 Appellant, Bertha Flores, brings an interlocutory appeal after an adverse ruling on her motion for summary judgment based on the affirmative defense of official immunity. 3 The only issue here is the constitutionality of a Tort Claims Act provision that bars claims against an employee after a judgment is rendered in the action giving rise to the claim. If constitutional, appellee, Anne Law, is barred from asserting her claims against Flores. We…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  3. University of Texas Medical Branch v. YorkTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Thomas v. OldhamTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Edinburg Hospital Authority v. TreviñoTexas Supreme Court · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Kamel v. University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2010
  3. Hintz Ex Rel. Hintz v. Lally, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010
  4. Lund v. GiauqueCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  5. Smith v. Altman, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2000

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API