Legal Opinion

Riley v. Fitzgerald

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1986No. B008127PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STONE, P. J.

Here we are asked to decide whether appellants, as sole shareholders of a dissolved Texas corporation and assignees of its assets, may prosecute an action asserting injuries to and fraud upon the corporation after the three-year postdissolution survival period provided by Texas law. We hold they may not and affirm the judgment.

*874James C. Riley, Jr., and James C. Riley III (Rileys), Texas residents, appeal from judgment on the pleadings based upon the trial court’s holding that Rileys’ causes of action are barred because, pursuant to Texas common law and article 7.12 of the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Sax v. VottelerTexas Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fahey v. MalloneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  3. Ward v. TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Nelson v. KrusenTexas Supreme Court · 1984

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Penasquitos, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Sturtevant v. Town of WinthropSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  3. Havlicek v. Coast-To-Coast Analytical Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  4. Greb v. Diamond International Corp.California Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Pittelman v. PearceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API