Leeds v. Cooley
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOYT, Justice.
Appellant, Elizabeth Leeds (Leeds), is appealing from a summary judgment in a medical malpractice suit. Appellees, Doctors Riquelme, Keats, and Arthur S. Keats, M.D. Associates (“the doctors”), were granted summary judgment based on the statute of limitations. Following the granting of the summary judgment, the court severed that part of the suit from the remainder of Leeds’ claim, so that the judgment became final and appealable. We affirm.
Under the direction of Drs. Reul and Cooley, appellant underwent coronary bypass surgery on December 28, 1976, and again on February…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Borderlon v. PeckTexas Supreme Court · 1983
- Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- Nichols v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- Weaver v. WittTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Hays v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1972
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dougherty v. GiffordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Koch Oil Co. v. Wilber, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1995
- Enterprise-Laredo Associates v. Hachar's, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1992
- Foust v. Estate of Walters, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2000
- Seibert v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.