Tsirikos-Karapanos v. Ford Motor Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
MARY J. BOYLE, J.:
{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Nikolaos Tsirikos-Karapanos, ("appellant") appeals from a judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment to defendants-appellees, Ford Motor Company ("Ford") and Valley Ford Truck, Inc. ("VFT"). In his sole assignment of error, appellant argues that the trial court's grant of summary judgment to the appellees was in error because there exists genuine issues of material facts and, thus, the trial court could not grant summary judgment as a matter of law. Finding no merit to appellant's appeal, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.
I.…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harless v. Willis Day Warehousing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992
- Wing v. Anchor Media, Ltd.Ohio Supreme Court · 1991
- Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Loury v. Westside Automotive GroupOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Lester v. FCA US, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
- Diguglielmo v. FCA US, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Hanamura-Valashinas v. Transitions by Firenza, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
- Eye v. Sal's Heating & Cooling, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.