Legal Opinion

Rolfe v. Dudley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1885PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Wayne. (Chambers, J.) Trover. Defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

The plaintiff brought trover to recover damages for the alleged conversion of a three-springed *209phaeton. The defendants pleaded the general issue, with notice of justification imder a valid writ of attachment issued by a justice of the peace.

The circuit judge certifies in the bill of excejffions that the bill contains the substance of all the evidence and proceedings in the cause had on the trial. The evidence is not set forth, but it is stated that evidence was introduced tending to prove certain facts stated in the bill of exceptions. In such cases it will be presumed that the verdict of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harvey v. McAdamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Adams v. AbramMichigan Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nugent v. NugentMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Schoenfeld v. BourneMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Treat v. DunhamMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API