Legal Opinion
Muller v. Jackson Hole Mountain Resort
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided August 11, 2006No. 05-207PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Justice.
[¶ 1] By order entered on September 20, 2005, this Court agreed to answer questions certified to us pursuant to W.R.A.P. 11, by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. In that order we designated Sharon Muller and Jeff Muller (Muller or Mullers) as Appellants. Jackson Hole Mountain Resort (Resort) is the Appellee.
THE CERTIFIED QUESTIONS
[¶ 2] These are the questions we agreed to answer:
1. Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-1-122(a)(ii), Wyoming’s Recreational Safety Act (RSA) “does not apply to a cause of action based upon the design or manufacture of sport or…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Murphy v. Steeplechase Amusement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Sunday v. Stratton Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1978
- Cooperman v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Halpern v. WheeldonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Wright v. Mt. Mansfield Lift, Inc.District Court, D. Vermont · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Johnson v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
- Beckwith v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Creel v. L & L, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
- Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Corp. v. RohrmanWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
- Bloomer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.