Legal Opinion

Bloomer v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 2009No. S-08-0139PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Justice.

[11] Appellant, Richard G. Bloomer (Bloomer), was convicted of two counts of possession of methamphetamine with intent to deliver, He challenges those convictions on the basis that the district court erred in denying his motion to quash the jury panel because the method used to select that panel violated principles associated with selecting a jury that represents a fair cross section of the community. In addition, he asserts that the district court refused to consider probation for Bloomer in violation of established legal principles. We will affirm.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] Bloomer raises…

2Cases cited61 opinions

  1. Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Taylor v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Castaneda v. PartidaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. State Ex Rel. Hoover v. BergerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Appalachian Power Co. v. State Tax DepartmentWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Foster v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Trumbull v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Guardianship of ParkhurstWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Boykin v. Parkhurst ex rel. BoykinWyoming Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Trevor C. Lake v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2013

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API