Legal Opinion

Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Corp. v. Rohrman

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided December 19, 2006No. 05-290PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

HILL, Justice.

[11] By notice entered on December 20, 2005, this Court agreed to answer questions certified to us in accordance with Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-13-106 (LexisNexis 2005) and W.R.A.P. 11, by the United States District Court for the District of Wyoming, the Honorable William F. Downes presiding. In our notice we designated Jackson Hole Mountain Resort (JHMR) as the Appellant. Phillip Rohrman is the Appellee.

THE CERTIFIED QUESTION

[12] The question certified to us is this:

When faced with motions for summary judgment in which there are no genuine issues of material fact, how should a court…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Hill.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  2. Cooperman v. DavidCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  3. Halpern v. WheeldonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Loney v. Laramie Auto Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission v. Mills Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Roberts v. Jackson Hole Mountain Resort Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Amos v. Lincoln County School District No. 2Wyoming Supreme Court · 2015
  3. Beckwith v. WeberWyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Creel v. L & L, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Standish v. Jackson Hole Mountain ResortCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API