Cooperman v. David
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
EBEL, Circuit Judge.
Appellants Howard and Trudy Cooper-man (“the Coopermans”) appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Appellee Matt David, d/b/a/ Wyoming Rivers and Trails (‘WRT”) in this personal injury diversity action. The Coo-permans argue that the district court erred when it found that a slipping saddle is an inherent risk of horseback riding. Because this record on summary judgment establishes, without genuine dispute, that it is an inherent risk of horseback riding that a saddle may slip because of a loose cinch, and because plaintiffs put on no evidence of a…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Simms v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Mental Health & Substance Abuse ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Halpern v. WheeldonWyoming Supreme Court · 1995
- Cooperman v. DavidDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Selenke v. Radiology ImagingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Carabajal v. City of Cheyenne, WYCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Matson v. Burlington Northern Santa Fe RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2001
- Foster v. AlliedSignal, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.