Legal Opinion
Brooks v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.
District Court, E.D. North Carolina
Decided September 5, 1996No. 4:91-cv-00058PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MALCOLM J. HOWARD, District Judge.
On July 13, 1995, this court entered a summary judgment order in nine related causes of action in which the plaintiffs conceded that their land had not been contaminated. This matter is before the court because the defendant (“Du Pont”) claims that although the plaintiffs in the two above-cap tioned actions have not admitted that their properties are uncontaminated, the court’s reasoning in its prior summary judgment order is applicable because the plaintiffs’ land has not, in fact, been contaminated.
Discussion
In the court’s previous summary judgment…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
- Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Magaly Pinares v. United Technologies CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- Cook v. Rockwell International Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 2003
- In Re Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether (MTBE) ProductsDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- City of Greenville v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2010
- United Water New York, Inc. v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.