Legal Opinion
State v. Schroeder
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 18, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ZINTER, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Joshua Schroeder was found guilty of possession of a controlled substance. His conviction was based solely upon the presence of methamphetamine in his urine. He contends that his conviction should be reversed because there was no other physical evidence that he possessed methamphetamine. We affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
[¶ 2.] A highway patrol officer stopped a vehicle in which Schroeder was a passenger. After receiving consent, the officer searched the vehicle and found a digital scale under the front passenger seat. Both the driver and Schroeder denied owning the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Sander v. Geib, Elston, Frost Professional Ass'nSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Peterson, Ex Rel. Peterson v. BurnsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. HansonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- South Dakota Subsequent Injury Fund v. Federated Mutual Insurance, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. GriffinCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- State v. MattsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Credit Collection Services, Inc. v. PesickaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- In re R.L.H.Montana Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. WhistlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Hedel-Ostrowski v. City of SpearfishSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.