Legal Opinion
State v. Mattson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided June 8, 2005No. NonePublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERTSON, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1.] Defendant, while riding as a passenger, was arrested along with the driver of the vehicle and several passengers after a drug dog sniff conducted at a routine traffic stop revealed the presence of drugs. Defendant was convicted of possession of methamphetamine. On appeal, Defendant contends the trial court erred when it allowed the State to introduce as other acts evidence, statements made by and a urine sample given by Defendant to law enforcement three months prior to his arrest for the events of September 7, 2003. Defendant alleges the drug dog sniff…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- State v. FierroSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Supreme Pork, Inc. v. Master Blaster, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BowkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In the Matter of Estate of DuebendorferSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- St. John v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.