Legal Opinion
Hedel-Ostrowski v. City of Spearfish
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 21, 2004No. NonePublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEIERHENRY, Justice.
[¶ 1.] The trial court granted City of Spearfish and Keith Hepper’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court found that Dawn Hedel-OstrowsM’s (Hedel-Os-trowski) negligence claim against the City and the negligence and nuisance claims against Hepper were barred by the statute of limitations. The trial court further dismissed Hedel-Ostrowski’s nuisance claim against the City. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] Hedel-Ostrowski accompanied her two children to a Spearfísh city park on September 18, 1999. Hedel-Ostrowski fell when the swing she was using broke. The fall caused nerve…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Kilkenny v. Arco Marine Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Brooks v. IsinghoodWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2003
- Georgia Railroad & Banking Co. v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Luther v. City of WinnerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Krier v. Dell Rapids Twp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Klutman v. Sioux Falls StormSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Loesch v. City of HuronSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- Harms v. Cigna Insurance CompaniesDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2006
- Tovsland v. ReubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.