Legal Opinion

Matlack, Inc. v. Butler Manufacturing Company

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 4, 1966No. Civ. A. 37439PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD, District Judge.

This is a motion for summary judgment under F.R.Civ.P. 56 brought by defendant Butler Manufacturing Company on the grounds that the plaintiff’s claim is barred by the applicable statute of limitations and that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

In 1960 plaintiff Matlack, Inc. purchased 50 cement carrying trailers from defendant, Butler Manufacturing Company. Hercules CV 4-180 gasoline engines were to be placed on the trailers in order to drive the unloading mechanism. Plaintiff alleges that shortly after delivery of the initial trailer,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Robin Construction Company, a Corporation of New Jersey, Richard D. Masia and Judith Masia v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1965
  3. Gardiner v. Philadelphia Gas WorksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  4. Wilt v. SmackDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Cunningham v. Joseph Horne Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Rosenau v. City of New Brunswick and Gamon Meter Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  2. Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  3. Rosenau v. City of New BrunswickSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1968
  4. Romano v. Westinghouse Electric Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1975
  5. Raymond-Dravo-Langenfelder v. Microdot, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API