Legal Opinion

Raymond-Dravo-Langenfelder v. Microdot, Inc.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided February 23, 1977No. Civ. A. 74-254PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

STAPLETON, District Judge:

This is a breach of contract action in which jurisdiction is based on diversity. The Court is asked to determine here whether the principal action and/or the third party action is barred by the statute of limitations.

•' Raymond-Dravo-Langenfelder (hereinafter “RDL”), the plaintiff, is a joint venture composed of a New Jersey, a Pennsylvania, and a Maryland corporation. The complaint alleges that RDL was the prime contractor for the construction of a bridge across the Chesapeake Bay in Maryland and that RDL contracted to purchase a number of steel pier forms…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. CarnahanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Binkley Company v. Teledyne Mid-America CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1971
  5. Headrick v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1950

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Certainteed Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Holdridge v. Heyer-Schulte Corp. of Santa BarbaraDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1977
  4. Shewbrooks v. AC AND S. INC.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1988
  5. New England Power Co. v. Riley Stoker Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1985

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API