Legal Opinion
United States v. Yepez
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 25, 2011No. 09-50271, 09-50409PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge WARDLAW; Dissent by Judge TIMLIN.
OPINION
WARDLAW, Circuit Judge:
“[CJomity between state and federal courts ... has been recognized as a bulwark of the federal system.” Allen v. McCurry, 449 U.S. 90, 96, 101 S.Ct. 411, 66 L.Ed.2d 308 (1980). California Penal Code § 1203.3 permits state judges who are supervising individuals placed on state probation to terminate retroactively the terms of probation to which they had previously sentenced those defendants. Each of the defendants in these consolidated appeals was serving such a probationary sentence when he committed and pleaded…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Stinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Leif Taylor v. Thomas M. Maddox, Interim Director George Galaza Cal TerhuneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. W. HarkonenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. David YepezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. David YepezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. David YepezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. YepezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011