Legal Opinion

United States v. W. Harkonen

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2013No. 11-10209, 11-10242UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM *

A jury convicted Defendant W. Scott Harkonen of wire fraud for issuing a fraudulent press release. The district court sentenced Harkonen to three years probation and a $20,000 fine. Harkonen appeals his conviction, and the government cross-appeals Harkonen’s sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm Harkonen’s conviction and sentence.

First Amendment Challenge

We review First Amendment challenges to criminal convictions in two steps: (1) deferring to the jury’s findings on historical facts, credibility determinations, and the elements of statutory…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Matrixx Initiatives, Inc. v. SiracusanoSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  2. Skilling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  3. Carpenter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  5. American School of Magnetic Healing v. McAnnultySupreme Court of the United States · 1902

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harkonen v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Harkonen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Cohen v. TrumpDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2016
  4. InterMune, Inc. and Roche Holdings, Inc. v. W. Scott Harkonen, M.D.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2023
  5. InterMune, Inc. and Roche Holdings, Inc. v. W. Scott Harkonen, M.D.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API