Bingenheimer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtOrtega, J.
Plaintiff was injured in a single-car accident after losing control of her car. She sought coverage for her injuries under her uninsured motorist (UM) policy with defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (State Farm) on the theory that the accident was caused by a “phantom vehicle” under ORS 742.504(2)(g). She appeals the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of State Farm. We affirm.
The facts, stated in the light most favorable to plaintiff as the nonmoving party,1 are as follows. Plaintiff was driving in the far right lane on Interstate 5 in an area of Portland…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Vega v. Farmers InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Robinson v. Lamb's Wilsonville ThriftwayOregon Supreme Court · 2001
- Watzig v. TobinOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Kaufman v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1962
- To v. State Farm Mutual InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bingenheimer v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Nau v. Safeco Insurance Company of IllinoisCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017