Legal Opinion

State v. Sayre

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 1989No. 21, September Term, 1988PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ADKINS, Judge.

Under Maryland Rule 4-345(b), a “court may modify or reduce or strike, but may not increase the length of, a sentence” once sentence has been imposed. [Emphasis supplied.] The question before us is: when is a sentence deemed to be imposed for purposes of the rule’s prohibition against increase? Under the circumstances of this case, we shall hold that an increase in the length of sentence was impermissible. '

Robert Thomas Sayre, Jr. (Sayre), an inmate at the Roxbury Correctional Institution/in Hagerstown, violated institutional rules when he used a homemade “fishing line” to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States v. DiFrancescoSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Pennsylvania v. GoldhammerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Pugh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Rutherford v. KatzenbergerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  5. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Greco v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  2. Hoile v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
  3. Gray v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Dotson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Ridgeway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API